It’s not easy being a moviegoer these days. Having emerged from my post-Oscar coma a few weeks ago, I’ve been struggling to stay on top of the city’s cinematic bounty, whether it’s the longer, uncut "Metropolis" (Film Forum), the "Cremaster" series (IFC Center) or "Iron Man 2" (everywhere).
None of these need help luring audiences. But if there’s one series that should be getting a lot more attention (and crowds) than it is, it would be Social Dramas and Shimmering Spectacles: Muslim Cultures of Bombay Cinema, playing at the Walter Reade Theater through the May 27.
Bollywood has failed to cross over in this country, and that owes a lot to its reputation for frothy, ridiculous spectacles. What most people don’t realize is that periodically, Indian cinema isn’t just entertaining, but relevant as well, particularly at this point in time, when issues like Islamic radicalization and cartoon images of the Prophet Muhammad dominate the news.
If you’ve overdosed on the standard talking points — the Us vs. Them geopolitics of Islam hashed out on cable news, ad nauseam — consider this series a tonic of sorts. Its 13 films range from historical blockbusters like “Mughal-e-Azam” (set during the extravagant, 16th century reign of Mughal Emperor Akbar) to modern critiques of India’s Partition and the place of Muslims in society (”Garm Hawa“), to recent movies about radicalization, like “Fiza,” starring heartthrob Hrithik Roshan as the Muslim turned terrorist.
I’ve actually seen “Fiza,” earlier, and thought it got pretty ridiculous by the end. But what it does accomplish — which rarely if ever happens in Hollywood movies — is provide a window into the mind of someone who decides to become an extremist.
The film festival was organized by Richard Allen, an NYU film studies professor, along with Ira Bhaskar, who teaches at Jawaharlal Nehru University, in New Delhi. Their recent book, “Islamicate Cultures of Bombay Cinema,” looks at the full history of Muslim historical films, the genre known as the Muslim Social, as well as movies about courtesans, like the hugely popular Pakeezah.
I met up with Allen at a recent party launching the film series. It was a fairly lavish affair, organized by the Indo-American Arts Council. Guests were required to come dressed in Mughal attire, and of course I obliged, if primarily out of fear.
More than mere spectacles, Allen thinks some of these films were instructive as well regarding basic issues like gender divisions.
“These were films that once addressed to the Muslim community, ‘How are we to deal with the pressures of social change on traditional social life. How are we to deal with education?’”
And in the absence of any meaningful artistic examination of issues related to Islam emerging from Western popular culture, he thinks India — namely Indian culture — has something to say to the rest of the world.
“It’s a history that involves a partition and a history that involves communalism,” he said. “But it’s a history that more than any other country one can think, in this contemporary period, lived through and lived with how to negotiate conflict and how to resolve conflict. So there’s tremendous opportunities for India in this regard.”
The film festival runs through May 27.
Comments [2]
Hi Ariti,
Thanks. I generally enjoy Bollywood movies on terrorism, especially because they go where Hollywood simply cant/won't. Fiza didn't do it for me - neither did My Name is Khan, or New York.
But I do like Aamir - I think it's quite great - as well as Kurbaan, and A Wednesday. I also like Sarfarosh, with Aamir Khan, from the late 90s - it's dated, and Sonali Bhendre is a pretty bad actress, but it works. Still haven't seen Mission Kashmir.
Best,
Arun
I agree that Fiza does give reasoning to Hrithik's terrorist psyche, but I think your are bit harsh to say it is a terrible film. Mission Kashmir was a far better film and could have made the same argument. I actually believe that film exemplifies how terrorism works in war torn, impoverished countries. I guess my point is that substantial amount of criticism is held upon Bollywood cinema. It is as if the films of the 70's and 80's have been discredited for their exemplification of life in India in a joint family, or the economic hardships. Bollywood today is no longer about India, but every other country. I didnt find Fiza to be that ridiculous because that is the style of Bollywood films. Great article nonetheless.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.